8:30 am I walked into Dr. Harris' south office and I didn't even need to sign in. There stood Holly, my new best friend, talking with her colleagues. "Come on back," she smiled.
During the delay I had a good deal of time to do some research about the OncotypeDX test. This test returns a score between 0 -100 that represents the probability of recurrence of this type of cancer somewhere in the body, over the next 10 years. 0-7 was considered low probability. 8-31 was considered moderate probability. 32+ was the "oh shit' range.
Dr. Harris started by sharing that my blood work was normal and I was definitely not pregnant. Funny guy. As he started talking about the test results I just kept thinking, "give me the numbers...give me the numbers!"
One was a 7. The other was an 11. My heart skipped a beat. Not a 0, but definitely not bad! Naturally , the combined risk was slightly higher (later that day my brother helped me calculate that score --- the relative probability is the square root of the sum of the squares of each number --- for those of you who care). That combined number is 13.
I clearly got the message from Dr. Harris that I should consider the fact that both tumors presented at the same time. He then went on to say that choosing against a systemic treatment (chemotherapy) would be an OK decision. Choosing for the treatment would be an OK decision, too. I also got the sense, every so slightly, that if he was making the choice for himself, he would err on the side of caution i.e. go for it.
I, on the other had, having read and researched for coutless hours, considered not going for it to be the side of caution, especially with these new data inputs. In general my normal probability of recurrance would be 1% per year for 10 years ---- i.e. 10%. The difference here --- 3 % for the combined risk, seemed inconsequential when you consider that there is concern about the possibility of causing other cancers, long term, as a result of these chemo treatments.
I am a firm believer in the body's ability to heal itself, and I am the only one on this planet who knows what types of both external and internal stresses I was subjected to or felt over the past years that could have contributed to the failure of my immune system to fight this. Managing those factors and those stresses was going to have to be an integral part of my healing and survival treatment.
I told Dr. Harris that I was 90% sure I would decide against the treatment. I was about to spend the 4th of July weekend with my sister and her husband, Len, a physician himself, so I figured I would discuss it with them and confirm any unsettled feelings I was having about making what seemed to be such a fateful decision.
As I was to learn later, through reading and discussion, there is nothing fateful about the decision. Especially under my set of circumstances. I could choose yes and still have a recurrence. I could choose no and still have a recurrence. No one will ever, really know what the correct choice was.
I choose no - and no recurence, thank you very much.
Recent Comments